OSS Contribution Log: Blog on Logs merged into OWASP

Markdown has massive adoption. It clearly meets a need. The cost of HTML's power is verbosity, and sometimes that's the wrong tradeoff: More typing. Writing HTML is slow. More visual noise. Reading HTML is hard. Browsers should support Markdown natively. The syntax should be part of HTML. There should be no need for a shim to translate. This is very practical: There is no Markdown syntax that can't be represented in HTML. Markdown-to-HTML conversion is easy to implement. Security risks...